Most significant positive evidence
Meaningful Muslim-Christian dialogue and public rejection of violent religious extremism.
Person
Ahmed el-Tayeb
Interfaith dialogue, opposition to extremism, equal citizenship, LGBT exclusion and political alignment in Egypt.
This is a contemporary assessment current to 26 June 2026. It must be revised as later conduct and evidence become available.
Ethical assessment categories
Current published result
Overall ethical score
+26.67
Reasoned summary
A mixed record: constructive interfaith leadership weakened by exclusion and alignment with state power.
This assessment presents six separate ethical dimensions rather than one overall moral score. Each result must be read with its evidence, plausible range, confidence, disputes, exclusions, severe-harm findings and sources.
Most significant negative evidence
Selective equality, hostility to LGBT rights and support for a coercive political transition.
Read the full Ahmed el-Tayeb ethical assessment, evidence and sources
Six-dimensional ethical profile
The overall figure is the equal-weight average of the applicable dimensions. It does not replace the separate scores, evidence or uncertainty.
- Personal moral conduct
- +35.00
- Rights and dignity
- -1.67
- Nonviolence and harm
- +35.00
- Stewardship of power
- Not applicable
- Wisdom and truthfulness
- +30.00
- Consequential legacy
- +35.00
- Severe-harm record
- No separate finding recorded
Assessment history
Ethical assessment: Ahmed el-Tayeb (2010–2026)
2010–2026 · Published assessment · reviewed June 26, 2026
Result: Six-dimensional ethical profile