Principles

Amsterdam Declaration 2022

Four official principles presenting humanism as ethical, rational, fulfilment-oriented and a non-dogmatic source of meaning and purpose.

Tradition or school
Secular Humanism
Framework type
Principles
Authority classification
Philosophical
Observance
Aspirational
Research status
Published and reviewed
Origin period
Adopted in 2022
Origin region
International humanist movement; adopted in Glasgow
Attributed origin
Members and associates of Humanists International
Intended audience
Humanists and those studying modern humanism
Published constituent items
4
Last reviewed
28 June 2026

Names and terminology

Alternative names: Declaration of Modern Humanism 2022

Primary texts and authority

The Amsterdam Declaration 2022 was democratically adopted by Humanists International as its current defining statement.

Rules, principles or steps

  1. Humanists Strive to Be Ethical

    Ground morality in the capacities of living beings to suffer and flourish, using reason and compassion.

    Mixed formulation · Aspirational

Historical development

The original declaration was adopted in 1952, revised in 2002 and replaced by the current 2022 version.

Variations

Humanists and humanist organisations remain diverse; the declaration is an international movement statement, not a creed binding every non-religious person.

Traditional interpretation

The declaration grounds ethics in suffering, flourishing, reason and compassion rather than supernatural authority.

Controversies and disputes

Questions include whether humanism overstates confidence in reason, how human values are justified, and whether its account adequately addresses non-human life.

Truth By Reason analysis

The statement is unusually open to correction and explicitly links freedom with responsibility. Its principles still require practical methods for resolving conflicts between rights, welfare and environmental limits.

Ethical themes

  • Justice
  • Compassion
  • Human dignity
  • Freedom
  • Truth-seeking
  • Environmental responsibility

Explanations, comparisons and discussions

Sources