- Formal name
- Sir Keir Rodney Starmer
- Subject type
- Person
- Status
- Active
- Jurisdiction or scope
- United Kingdom
- Relevant dates
- Born 1962; assessed premiership 2024–2026
Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. The assessment covers employment and renters' rights, NHS reform, asylum policy, human-rights obligations, arms-export decisions and the exercise of executive responsibility since July 2024.
This is a contemporary assessment current to 26 June 2026. It must be revised as later conduct and evidence become available.
Ethical assessment categories
Current published result
Reasoned summary
The government has produced material improvements in labour, housing and health policy. The result is reduced by continuing concerns over asylum, detention and human-rights protections. The short period assessed produces a wide uncertainty range.
This assessment presents six separate ethical dimensions rather than one overall moral score. Each result must be read with its evidence, plausible range, confidence, disputes, exclusions, severe-harm findings and sources.
Most significant positive evidence
The assessment records major employment-rights legislation, the abolition of no-fault eviction, additional NHS activity and the suspension of arms-export licences where the government identified a clear risk of serious humanitarian-law breaches.
Most significant negative evidence
The principal negative evidence concerns unresolved asylum and detention safeguards, proposals to weaken aspects of European human-rights protection and a political approach to migration that may prioritise deterrence over individual dignity.
Read the full Keir Starmer
ethical assessment, evidence and sources
Six-dimensional ethical profile
The overall figure is the equal-weight average
of the applicable dimensions. It does not replace
the separate scores, evidence or uncertainty.
-
Personal moral conduct
-
+25.00
-
Rights and dignity
-
+20.46
-
Nonviolence and harm
-
+15.00
-
Stewardship of power
-
+40.00
-
Wisdom and truthfulness
-
+22.63
-
Consequential legacy
-
+23.43
- Severe-harm record
-
No separate finding recorded
Assessment history
2024–2026
·
Published assessment
·
reviewed June 26, 2026
Result:
Six-dimensional ethical profile
Related ethical assessments