KIR-1
Religious legitimation of aggressive war
Religious legitimation of aggressive war.
- Ethical axis
- Benefit ↔ Harm
- Ethical direction
- Negative pole
- Evidence status
- Verified
- Period
- 2009–2026
- Affected scope
- Russian Orthodox Church
View the Patriarch Kirill ethical assessment profile
This assessment does not reduce the subject to one moral ranking. Each dimension is scored separately from −100 to +100 and must be read with its evidence and uncertainty.
Scorecard status: Recalculated under multidimensional system
Alignment with the Russian state, justification of war, militarised religion, nationalism and exclusion.
The score evaluates documented public conduct during the stated period. It does not measure inherent human worth, does not constitute a legal verdict and remains open to correction when stronger evidence becomes available.
A strongly negative record dominated by deliberate moral support for aggressive war and state power.
This assessment presents six separate ethical dimensions rather than one overall moral score. Each result must be read with its evidence, plausible range, confidence, disputes, exclusions, severe-harm findings and sources.
| Domain | Score | Intensity | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consequences | -85.0 | 85.0 | B — high |
| Rights and duties | -70.0 | 70.0 | B — high |
| Virtue and character | -75.0 | 75.0 | B — high |
| Intentions | -85.0 | 85.0 | B — high |
| Care | -80.0 | 80.0 | B — high |
| Justice | -85.0 | 85.0 | B — high |
| Wisdom and judgment | -80.0 | 80.0 | B — high |
| Baseline ethics | -90.0 | 90.0 | B — high |
| Positive pole | Negative pole | Score | Intensity | Confidence | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human dignity | Dehumanisation | -90.0 | 90.0 | B — high | Calculated from 1 reviewed evidence item(s) concerning Human dignity and Dehumanisation. |
| Care | Neglect | -80.0 | 80.0 | B — high | Calculated from 1 reviewed evidence item(s) concerning Care and Neglect. |
| Benefit | Harm | -85.0 | 85.0 | B — high | Calculated from 1 reviewed evidence item(s) concerning Benefit and Harm. |
| Benevolent intention | Malicious intention | -85.0 | 85.0 | B — high | Calculated from 1 reviewed evidence item(s) concerning Benevolent intention and Malicious intention. |
| Justice | Injustice | -85.0 | 85.0 | B — high | Calculated from 1 reviewed evidence item(s) concerning Justice and Injustice. |
| Respect for rights | Violation of rights | -70.0 | 70.0 | B — high | Calculated from 1 reviewed evidence item(s) concerning Respect for rights and Violation of rights. |
| Integrity | Corruption | -75.0 | 75.0 | B — high | Calculated from 1 reviewed evidence item(s) concerning Integrity and Corruption. |
| Wisdom | Ignorance | -80.0 | 80.0 | B — high | Calculated from 1 reviewed evidence item(s) concerning Wisdom and Ignorance. |
Limited positive weight is given to ordinary pastoral and charitable church functions.
Religious authority was used to legitimise aggression, repression and dehumanising nationalism.
KIR-1
Religious legitimation of aggressive war.
KIR-2
Alignment with repression and exclusion.
KIR-3
Religious ethics subordinated to power.
KIR-4
Intentional ideological support for war.
KIR-5
Victims subordinated to state loyalty.
KIR-6
Denial of equal Ukrainian sovereignty.
KIR-7
Dogmatic and reckless conflict framing.
KIR-8
Religious dehumanisation of opponents.
Attribution and interpretation remain disputed; the assessment follows documented public conduct.
Unverified private allegations and conduct outside reasonable responsibility were excluded.
No corrections have been recorded.