- Formal name
- Kim Jong Un
- Subject type
- Person
- Status
- Active
- Jurisdiction or scope
- Democratic People's Republic of Korea
- Relevant dates
- Born approximately 1984; assessed leadership 2011–2026
Supreme leader of North Korea. The assessment covers totalitarian rule, political prison camps, executions, collective punishment, food insecurity, denial of freedom, nuclear and missile escalation and state cooperation with limited humanitarian programmes.
This is a contemporary assessment current to 26 June 2026. It must be revised as later conduct and evidence become available.
Ethical assessment categories
Current published result
Reasoned summary
The evidence lies near the most destructive pole in every ethical domain. Limited humanitarian cooperation carries negligible weight against continuing crimes against humanity and systematic denial of the population's basic rights and needs.
This assessment presents six separate ethical dimensions rather than one overall moral score. Each result must be read with its evidence, plausible range, confidence, disputes, exclusions, severe-harm findings and sources.
Most significant positive evidence
The assessment records limited cooperation with UN humanitarian and disability, health and disaster-relief programmes. These activities receive low attribution and cannot offset the systematic state structure of repression.
Most significant negative evidence
The overwhelming evidence concerns crimes against humanity, political prison camps, execution, torture, enforced disappearance, starvation, total denial of freedom and diversion of resources toward military and nuclear programmes.
Read the full Kim Jong Un
ethical assessment, evidence and sources
Six-dimensional ethical profile
The overall figure is the equal-weight average
of the applicable dimensions. It does not replace
the separate scores, evidence or uncertainty.
-
Personal moral conduct
-
-90.00
-
Rights and dignity
-
-100.00
-
Nonviolence and harm
-
-95.00
-
Stewardship of power
-
-96.00
-
Wisdom and truthfulness
-
-90.00
-
Consequential legacy
-
-93.16
- Severe-harm record
-
Extreme
Assessment history
2011–2026
·
Published assessment
·
reviewed June 26, 2026
Result:
Six-dimensional ethical profile
Related ethical assessments